Minn. Recount Violates Constitution

Arbitrary calls are reminiscent of Florida 2000: Paulsen

By Ambreen Ali

Posted Jan 15, 2009 12:50 PM CST

Copied

Minn. Recount Violates Constitution — "The present 'certified' result, which is that Mr. Franken won by 225 votes out of more than 2.9 million cast, is an obvious, embarrassing violation of the Constitution," Paulsen writes. (AP Photo/Jim Mone, File)

Minnesota's Senate recount "is Florida 2000 all over again," Michael Stokes Paulsen writes in the Wall Street Journal. "The details differ, but not in terms of arbitrariness, lack of uniform standards" and other bad precedents the decision in Bush v. Gore created. The situation "isn't just embarrassing," Paulsen argues. "It is unconstitutional."

Al Franken currently leads Norm Coleman by 225 votes, but Bush v. Gore and state law must prevail to legitimatize the election results, Paulsen argues. "There is no looming national deadline. Minnesota can take its time and do things right." And if the "legal train wreck" can't be straightened out? "The Constitution's answer is a do-over."

Read These Next

Mom allegedly passed 31 hospitals on road trip as daughter was dying.
Man was planning cremation for his sister, who turned out to be alive.
'Putin wants legal recognition to what he has stolen.'
One of the Slender Man attackers escaped her group home, briefly.

Report an error